This blog is dedicated to the massive amount of information Billy has which will help reveal the truth, expose the lies and wake up the deceived as we each connect more dots. He and his father both worked on HAARP in Alaska and on C6 at Eglin AFB in Florida years ago. As a result, whenever HAARP ramps up, he has a seizure. The night of Japan's earthquake, Billy experienced 4 seizures and was hospitalized March 11-15, 2011.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Monday, August 22, 2011
HAARP Ring “3D cone shaped spiral vortex” shown on NAVY .mil website !
Simulations of ELF radiation generated by heating the high-latitude D- region
H.L. Rowland, Beam Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.By modulating the ambient current flowing in the ionosphere, e.g., the auroral electrojet, it is possible to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) and very low frequency (VLF) radiation. This ionospheric modification technique can provide such waves for probing both the Earth and the ionosphere- magnetosphere. The modification occurs in the lower D-region and can provide information about the ambient conditions in one of the least diagnosed regions of the ionosphere.

The electrojet is modulated by using a high frequency heater (a few MHZ) with the power modulated at the desired ELF/VLF frequency to heat the ionospheric electrons in the lower D-region. Figure 1a shows a sketch of the heater and heated region. The heated region is typically at 75 km (though this depends upon the carrier frequency) and can be 30 km in diameter and a few km thick. Viewed from above (see Figure 1b) the heated region is a roughly circular patch. The smoothness of the heated region depends upon the antenna radiation pattern as well as D-region conditions. The heating increases the electron-neutral collision rate which changes the conductivities. Since on ELF time scales the ambient electric field is constant, modulating the conductivity produces a current modulated at the same frequency. At these altitudes the conductivity change is predominantly in the Hall conductivity. If the ambient electric field, E, is in ±y direction, a time varying current perturbation is generated, j, in the ±x direction (Fig. 1b). The time varying current launches waves both up and down the Earth’s magnetic field. In the simulations shown here, we start with a time-varying current and study the downward propagating waves and how they couple into the Earth-ionospheric wave guide.
Animations
The animations show 5 different representations of the same simulation. The simulation uses a time-varying current perturbation (1 kHz) in the D-region at 75 km. The current is in the magnetic east-west direction. The Earth’s magnetic field is vertical. The simulation box is 1800 by 1800 by 120 km. Isosurfaces are shown for the absolute value of the horizontal magnetic field ABSB and of the vertical electric field ABSEZ. Also shown is the east-west magnetic field in the near-field BX1 and in the far-field BX2. Since the field amplitude falls off with distance, BX1 uses a order-of-magnitude larger isosurface value than BX2 to emphasize the field close to the site. The north- south magnetic field is shown in BY1 and BY2. These plots look slightly different from the absolute value plots where both the positive and negative surfaces were shown. Also BX and BY do have a different orientation of the their radiation patterns. The direction of the radiation is determined by the total horizontal field shown in ABSB and by the vertical electric field shown in ABSEZ. The radiation pattern in the earth-ionosphere waveguide is a combination of a linear dipole antenna and a right-hand circular antenna. At ELF frequencies because of low D-region absorption the dipole is dominant. The dipole radiates in the magnetic east-west direction.
Because 1 kHz is below cutoff the mode in the waveguide is a TEM mode. The mode consists of a horizontal B field perpendicular to the direction of propagation and a vertical electric field. With perfect conductors, the mode is uniform in the vertical direction. As the wave propagates in the waveguide, the top of the wave is approximately at the bottom of the ionosphere. Above the heated region, waves are also launched along the Earth’s magnetic field. In the near-field ( BX1 and BY1) one can see the pulse being radiated downward. It strikes the ground and reflects back up to the ionosphere. Part of the energy propagates up the field lines into the ionosphere. This is the bubble seen rising up. The D-region is highly collisional and damps this wave. Looking at BX2 and BY2 one can see that the energy mainly stays in the waveguide. If one looks closely at the top of the wave in the waveguide the wave appears to be curved. The waveguide mode is coupling into the bottom of the D-region and driving a whistler mode up the field lines. The whistlers have a much lower velocity than the waveguide mode and can only propagate along the field lines. This acts to curve the top of the waves. These waves help form the bubble that propagates up the field line. Because of this, the diameter of the bubble is much larger than the heated region.
Above the heated region in ABSEZ one can see a pair of coils revolving around each other. These are the currents that flow up and down the Earth’s magnetic field forming the current loops associated with the waves propagating up the field lines. Finally, EZ1 is a blow-up of the high-altitude portion of the vertical electric field for positive values of the electric field; the current loop is more clearly seen.
More details can be found in Rowland et al., JGR, 101, 27027, 1996 and Rowland, JGR, 104, 4319, 1999.
This work is supported by the Office of Naval Research and, in part, by a grant of HPC time from the DoD High Performance Computing Center at the Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground.






http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/whatsnew/haarp/
Read this full .pdf to understand more about how RADAR plays its part in several aspects to H.A.A.R.P. … also notice this “electron precipitation” is what the Finnish Scientist said about Fukushima and the quote “nail in the ground” theory. Here is the link to the Finnish scientist and his very plausible theory on fukushima:
http://www.dutchsinse.com/blog/?p=1365
links to the .pdf for download:
Doolittle PhD Dissertation HAARP VLF ELF
http://vlf.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Doolittle%20PhD%20Dissertation.pdf

Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Characteristics of Chem Cloud at Sunset
eslperry left a the following comment on post "HAARP /Electromagnetic Pulse
generators/Chem cloud...":
Hello
Someone sent me the following question dated 16 May 2011 - Can you answer it please?
'Please explain what the glowing clouds are!? I was landing in NYC at midnight.... and the clouds were SO BEAUTIFUL. blue & red. Everyone on the plane was talking about it. The odd part is, we circled nyc 3 times with no explanation.'
#1 displays characteristics of chem cloud at sunset in a neutral state.

#2 displays characteristics of the prismatic effect of a chem cloud at sunset in an excited state.
#3 displays the prismatic effect of chem cloud with refraction off the water at sunset in a neutral state.

#4 displays chem cloud and chem trail prismatic effect with water refraction at sunset in an excited state.

#5 prismatic effect of chem cloud and chem trail, no refraction, in a neutral state, at sunset in Florida.

Per chance one of the above pics may endow a solution to a very vague question.
generators/Chem cloud...":
Hello
Someone sent me the following question dated 16 May 2011 - Can you answer it please?
'Please explain what the glowing clouds are!? I was landing in NYC at midnight.... and the clouds were SO BEAUTIFUL. blue & red. Everyone on the plane was talking about it. The odd part is, we circled nyc 3 times with no explanation.'
#1 displays characteristics of chem cloud at sunset in a neutral state.
#2 displays characteristics of the prismatic effect of a chem cloud at sunset in an excited state.
#3 displays the prismatic effect of chem cloud with refraction off the water at sunset in a neutral state.
#4 displays chem cloud and chem trail prismatic effect with water refraction at sunset in an excited state.
#5 prismatic effect of chem cloud and chem trail, no refraction, in a neutral state, at sunset in Florida.
Per chance one of the above pics may endow a solution to a very vague question.
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
ANTENNA ARRAY CONFIGIGURATION FOR DDA SOFTWARE
per request Dutchsense the following:
Antenna Array Configuration for DDA software
Digisonde Antenna Arrays Two different types of antenna arrays can be implemented in the Digisonde system. 7-antenna array is used for the DGS256 (DISS) system while 4-antenna array is used with the DPS system. Figure 1 shows two types of standard-per-manual antenna configurations.
| |
(a) | (b) |
Figure 1. a) Standard Digisonde 7-antenna array configuration. b) Standard Digisonde 4-antenna array configuration
Antenna Array Specification for DDA
The DDA software features a generic scheme for antenna array specification that allows any possible antenna configuration to be entered. A variety of "standard" antenna configurations can be defined using DEVN, MAXSEP, and ROTATA parameters, and in a case of "non-standard" antenna setup, each antenna position in the array can be specified individually.
DDA Antenna configuration is specified in the ddasetup.onl file, at the line *185 with the following format:
*185 StationName < LAT, LONG, CGPLAT, CGPLONG, COMPN, MAXSEP, DEVN, ROTATA >
For example,
*185 HAARP < 62.24, 214.91, 80.00, -80.00, 23.8, 103.92, -30.0, 13 >
Parameters LAT, LONG, CGPLAT, CGPLONG, COMPN referring to the station location are explained below.
LAT - Station Latitude
LONG - Station Longitude
CGPLAT - Corrected Geomagnetic Pole Latitude
CGPLONG - Corrected Geomagnetic Pole Longitude
COMPNTD - Compass North Deviation (a.k.a. Magnetic Declination Angle). Positive angles correspond to the compass north deviation to the East of geographic north.
Figure 2. Definition of the COMPN parameter
Parameters MAXSEP, DEVN, ROTATA specify the antenna configuration itself.
MAXSEP: This variable specifies the maximum antenna separation of the largest triangle in the seven antenna array configuration (Figure 1a). Namely, MAXSEP is the distance in meters from antenna 5 to 6, 6 to 7, or 7 to 5. MAXSEP always refers to the outer antennas of the seven-antenna system, even if they are not present (as for the 4-antenna setup of the DPS). In the case of the DPS where only four antennas are available, the MAXSEP is specified as the distance between the virtual antennas 5, 6, and 7. For example, in the standard DPS antenna layout, with 60 m long triangle side (distance between antennas 2 and 3) MAXSEP should be set to103.92 m. In this case, the DPS antennas 2, 3, and 4 are referred to as the inner antennas of the 7 antenna array.
DEVN:
Parameter DEVN ("deviation") is defined as an angle between the direction to Compass North and the line passing through the antennas #3 and #1. This angle is counted counter-clockwise from the Compass North toward the "3-1" line (see Figure 3), taking values from -180 to 180.
|
Figure 3. Specification of the DEVN parameter.
ROTATA. This parameter (a) defines the antenna array configuration, and (b) also specifies the output coordinate system for skymap and velocity data calculated by the DDA software. Possible values for the ROTATA parameter are defined in the following table.
ROTATA | Antenna setup | ||
0 | 3 | 6 | Clockwise rotating 7 antenna setup |
1 | 4 | 7 | Clockwise rotating 4 Inner antenna setup |
2 | 5 | 8 | Clockwise rotating 4 Outer antenna setup |
9 | 12 | 15 | Counter-clockwise rotating 7 antenna setup |
10 | 13 | 16 | Counter-clockwise rotating 4 Inner ant. setup |
11 | 14 | 17 | Counter-clockwise rotating 4 Outer ant. setup |
-1 | -2 | -3 | Non-standard antenna setup |
Corrected Geomagnetic | Geomagnetic | Geographic | |
Output coordinate system | |||
Rotation Sense: This specifies the actual position of the antennas in the triangular array. In a seven‑antenna setup, antennas 6, 2, and 5 are located west of antenna 1, while antennas 4 and 7 are located east of antenna 1. This antenna field is said to be a counter-clockwise rotating field since spiraling from antenna 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 to 7 the spiral is in a counter-clockwise direction. For the mirror image array where antennas 7 and 4 are located west of antenna 1 and antennas 6, 2, and 5 are located east of antenna 1, the spiraling from antenna to antenna goes in a clockwise direction.
Standard Antenna Array Configurations
Historically, three standard Digisonde antenna array configurations were considered in the UMLCAR software for ionogram processing (ADEP, Viewer, SAO Explorer):
· Standard per manual
· Mirrored (rotated 180° about the X axis)
· Rotated (rotated 180° about the Z axis
Recently, in support of our DIDBase (Digital Ionogram DataBase) development, we have introduced a new scheme for specification of the Digisonde antenna array configurations. The following antenna array nomenclature is now used:
· Seven antennas standard
· Seven antennas mirrored
· Four antennas standard
· Four antennas mirrored
DDA antenna specification examples for some of commonly used antenna layouts can be found in the tables below.
Four Standard Antenna Array Configurations
Commonly used in Digisonde 256 and DISS DEVN = 0 MAXSEP = 100.0 ROTATA = { 9, 12, 15 } | |
Known installations:
DEVN = 0 MAXSEP = 100.0 ROTATA = { 0, 3, 6 } | |
In the "standard" configuration, antenna 1 to antenna 7 are walked counter-clockwise.
In the "mirror" configuration, antenna 1 to antenna 7 are walked clockwise.
Commonly used in DPS. DEVN = -30 MAXSEP = 103.92 ROTATA = { 10, 13, 16 } | |
Known installations:
DEVN = 30 MAXSEP = 103.92 ROTATA = { 1, 4, 7 } | |
Other known cases
Here's more examples of existing Digisonde antenna arrays configurations in the new encoding scheme:
Formerly "ROTATED DGS-256". Known installations: · Karachi · Kokubunji · Beijing DEVN = 180 MAXSEP = 100.0 ROTATA = { 9, 12, 15 } | |
DPS working on the internal loop of the array configuration "MIRRORED 7 ANTENNA DEVN=0" · Millstone Hill DEVN = 0 MAXSEP = 103.92 ROTATA = { 1, 4, 7 } | |
DPS working on the internal loop of the array configuration "STANDARD 7 ANTENNA DEVN=0" · Sondestrom · Ramey AFB DEVN = 0 MAXSEP = 100.0 ROTATA = { 10,13, 16 } | |
Formerly known as "DPS ROTATED" · Juliusruh? DEVN = 150 MAXSEP = 103.92 ROTATA = { 10,13, 16 } | |
Non-standard Antenna Array Configurations
If the antenna array configuration is not one of the standard (listed above), such a non-standard setup is described by direct specification of each antenna coordinates in the lines 170-183 of the ddasetup.onl file or lines 080-082 of the Station UDD file.
The ROTATA parameter shall be set negative in this case:
ROTATA = -1 DDA output is in Corrected Geomagnetic coordinates
ROTATA = -2 DDA output is in Compass coordinates
ROTATA = -3 DDA output is in Geographic coordinates
Individual antenna specifications should made in the system of coordinates (Figure 4), where
· X points to the Compass North at the time of installation
· Z is the local vertical pointing up, and
· Y forms the right-hand system (i.e., points to the West).
|
Figure 4. Coordinate system used in DDA for antenna orientation
Note: For non-standard antenna configurations, there is no need to specify parameters MAXSEP, COMPN, DEVN in ddasetup.onl file.
Monday, May 16, 2011
HAARP /Electromagnetic Pulse generators/Chem clouds=Flash Radar Ring+Geothermal Weather Control
THE LINK
- CYBERSPACE ORBIT
- REALTIME REALNEWS 24HRS WORLD WIDE
- FLASH RADAR RESEARCH
- PAGE 1 >>>> 2 ************* 12/30/98 PENNSYLVANIA RING ***
- FLASH RADAR RESEARCH
- **********1/21/1999 TEXAS N. MEXICO RING *****1/26/1999 TEXAS N.MEXICO RING
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 4 **12/31/98 ILLINOIS RING LARGE****1/31/99 TEXAS RING LARGE
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 5 11/27 - 12/20 - 12/21
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 6 12/12 - 12/12/98--TEXAS LRG. RING
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 7 **************1/4/99 PENN RING *****1/5/99 LOUISIANA RING****
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 8 12/2 - 12/2 - 12/2/98 MONTANA ODDITY
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 9 12/19 - 12/19 - 10/1/98 FAVORITE FROM THE PAST
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 10 12/7 - 12/7/98
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 11*****1/15/1999 AMAZING **YA GOTTA SEE IT TO BELIEVE IT
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 12 ********1/1/1999 HOLES IN THE SKY *****1/11/1999 HOLES IN THE SKY *******
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 13 11/3 - 11/3 - 11/3/98
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 14 11/3 - 11/3/98
- FLASH RESEARCH
- PAGE 15 12/21+22/98
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 16 **2/1/99 LRG. RING OVER NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA & CANADA **12/6/98 TURRET PEAK ARIZ.RING
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 17 12/8 - 12/8 - 12/8/98 AZ
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 18 11/7 - 11/7 - 11/7/98
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 19 11/7 - 11/7 - 11/7/98
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 20****1/12/1999 N.E. OKLAHOMA RING ***1/12/1999 MISSOURI RING ***
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 21 11/11 - 11/10/98
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 22 11/12 - 11/12 - 11/12
- FLASH RADAR
- PAGE 23 FLASH STATEMENT PAGE
- FLASH RADAR EMAIL TO POP UP
- COMMENTS WELCOME
- FLASH RADAR HOMEPAGE
- *********************NEW FLASH HOME PAGE DAILY UPDATES ***************
- CONTRAILS
- ***********CONTRAILS OVER AMERICA 2/23/1999
- FLASHX3
- RETURNS FROM CONCERNED FRIENDS--2/27/99
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

